Sustain This

Sustainability“Grant me chastity and continence,” Augustine famously prayed, “but not yet.” That tragicomic scene kept coming to me as I read Jeremy L. Caradonna’s Sustainability: A History. Few ideas can bear the sheer weight of irony than that of a human population destroying their own and only planet. We know we’re doing it, and yet for a few more greenbacks to flash before our fabulously wealthy peers, we don’t mind warming the place up by a few degrees. There’ll be time to throw on the brakes right before the crash. I once took a ride, perhaps unwisely, with a friend who believed nothing could go wrong. Although the car didn’t actually roll, it came awfully close, and I am haunted by what might have happened. The difference between that incident and destruction of the environment is that the latter has already happened.

I’m cynical enough not to believe in simple solutions to complex problems, and reading Caradonna was a sobering finish to a day that had started out optimistically. Such books are not easy to read. Science does not come charging over the hill like the cavalry to save us at the end of the picture. You can’t take your marbles and go home when the marble is home. Sustainability does not set out to be a bleak book. There is a guarded optimism to it, and I was particularly pleased to see that sustainists readily recognize that without some kind of just distribution of goods, no system will ever be sustainable. I had no idea, until I read this book, that some economists advocate for a steady state economic existence instead of the ridiculously illogical constant growth. Constant growth in a world of limited resources is the worst kind of delusion.

We’ve gone pretty far down the road to destroying our planet. Already it will take many decades to repair the damage done. If we can muster the will to address corporate greed with a good old dose of primate ethics. Society, in all honesty, may have to collapse before that happens. If it does, of course, the strong will survive. I have a prediction to make, and it’s one that rationalists won’t like. If we can’t avoid the wall that is right before us, and if society as we know it buckles under its own greed, the survivors will, as sure as gray matter, devise a religion to explain it. As a species we are all about myths. Like fabled saints we believe we can have our fossil fuels and consume them too. Before rising sea levels wash us all away, do yourself a favor and read Sustainability. And when you’re awake for nights afterward, tell everyone else you know to read it too.

3 thoughts on “Sustain This

  1. EnonZ

    The Archdruid, John Michael Greer, has written a number of times about the myths and legends of the coming dark age. Most recently:

    “As they [our descendants] think back on the people of the 20th and early 21st centuries who gave them the barren soil and ravaged fisheries, the chaotic weather and rising oceans, the poisoned land and water, the birth defects and cancers that embitter their lives, how will they remember us? I think I know. I think we will be the orcs and Nazgûl of their legends, the collective Satan of their mythology, the ancient race who ravaged the earth and everything on it so they could enjoy lives of wretched excess at the future’s expense. They will remember us as evil incarnate—and from their perspective, it’s by no means easy to dispute that judgment.”

    http://thearchdruidreport.blogspot.com/2014/08/dark-age-america-bitter-legacy.html

    Like

      • EnonZ

        You’re welcome. The Archdruid writes about mythos regularly, particularly with regard to how myths illuminate the underlying, unquestioned assumptions about the nature of reality that a culture holds or held to.

        I’m a regular reader of this blog, lurking for some time. I’m a thoroughgoing rationalist, but it seems to me only rational to recognize the anthropological truth that storytelling is something that all people everywhere do. As one author put it, we’re Homo narrans.

        For example, Star Trek, especially the original series, can be viewed as part of the mythos of what the Archdruid calls the ‘civil religion of progress’.

        Todays serendipity: as I was preparing this reply, I looked up the word ‘mythos’ in the New Oxford American Dictionary on my computer. One of the usage examples is this: “the rhetoric and mythos of science create the comforting image of linear progression toward truth.”

        There are rationalists that believe that the only truths are those that are rational, empirical and literal (the flip side of fundamentalism) and reject the idea that science even has a mythos. I’m not one of them, and I think I can say you’re not either.

        Like

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.